Can ICAC Overcome the Fate of Task Force Sweep? Independent Commission Against Corruption

The establishment of the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in Papua New Guinea (PNG) marks a significant milestone in the nation's fight against corruption. With the recent arrival of highly qualified and experienced ICAC Commissioners, the government, led by Prime Minister James Marape, has demonstrated its commitment to addressing the devastating impact of corruption on PNG's progress. 

This article examines the pros and cons of ICAC and compares it to the Investigative Task Force Sweep Team, headed by Sam Koim during the leadership of former Prime Minister Peter O'Neill between 2012 and 2019.

File photo

Pros of ICAC and its Role in Fighting Corruption

1. Strengthening Accountability: ICAC provides an independent and dedicated institution solely focused on combating corruption. By investigating and prosecuting corruption cases, it enhances accountability within government bodies and public institutions.

2. Expertise and Experience: The appointment of highly qualified Commissioners, such as Andrew Forbes, Daniel Baulch, and Graham Gill, brings extensive legal, law enforcement, and prevention expertise to ICAC. Their diverse backgrounds enhance the commission's capabilities and effectiveness.

3. Impartial Selection: The involvement of Transparency International in the selection process ensures impartiality and alleviates concerns about foreign nationals leading ICAC. The inclusion of various stakeholders in the ICAC Appointments Committee also promotes comprehensive oversight.

4. Complementary Legislation: ICAC is supported by the Whistle Blowers' Act (2020) and the Proceeds of Crime Act (2022), providing a robust legal framework for combating corruption. The combination of these laws strengthens ICAC's ability to investigate and prosecute corrupt individuals.

File photo

Cons of ICAC and Potential Challenges

1. Overlapping Mandates: While ICAC's establishment is a positive step, it may lead to confusion and duplication of efforts, particularly with existing anti-corruption agencies such as the Ombudsman Commission and the Police. Clear coordination and collaboration mechanisms should be established to ensure a streamlined approach.

2. Limited Resources: ICAC's effectiveness depends on adequate resources, both financial and human. Without sufficient funding and personnel, the commission may struggle to handle the high volume of corruption cases, especially in the political leadership domain, and fulfil its mandate effectively.

3. Political Interference: Despite ICAC's independence, political interference and influence remain a concern. It is crucial to safeguard the commission's autonomy and shield it from political pressures to ensure unbiased investigations and prosecutions.

4. Public Engagement and Awareness: While ICAC provides a platform for reporting corruption cases, the success of the commission depends on public participation. Creating awareness about ICAC's role, encouraging whistleblowing, and ensuring protection for those who report corruption will be essential in mobilizing public support.

Comparison with the Task Force Sweep Team

During Prime Minister Peter O'Neill's leadership, the Investigative Task Force Sweep (ITFS), headed by Sam Koim, played a crucial role in addressing corruption. Some points of comparison between the two initiatives include:

1. Independence: ICAC is established as a permanent and independent institution, ensuring continuity and long-term commitment to fighting corruption. In contrast, the Task Force Sweep Team was a temporary task force, which limited its sustainability and impact.

2. Legal Framework: ICAC operates under the ICAC Act (2020), providing a clear legal framework for its operations. The Task Force Sweep Team lacked dedicated legislation, which could have limited its authority, independence and accountability.

3. Powers and Resources: ICAC is endowed with extensive powers of investigation and prosecution, supported by appropriate resources. The Task Force Sweep Team faced challenges in obtaining necessary resources and experienced limitations in its powers, hindering its effectiveness.

4. Institutionalisation: ICAC's establishment signifies a systemic approach to combat corruption, focusing on preventive measures, investigations, and prosecutions. The Task Force Sweep Team, while successful in some cases, lacked the institutionalization required for sustained and comprehensive anti-corruption efforts.

File Photo

Summary (Independent Commission Against Corruption)

The establishment of the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in Papua New Guinea marks a significant step forward in the fight against corruption. While there are challenges and potential areas for improvement, the involvement of highly qualified Commissioners, the support of complementary legislation, and the commitment of the government underscore the importance of ICAC in addressing corruption. 

Comparing it to the Task Force Sweep Team highlights the advantages of a permanent and independent institution with a dedicated legal framework. 

To ensure the success of ICAC, continued public engagement, sufficient resources, and safeguarding its independence from political interference are vital. 

With a collective effort and unwavering commitment, ICAC can play a crucial role in eradicating corruption and fostering a more prosperous future for Papua New Guinea.

Special Relationship between Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islanders and PNG Kiwais

Australia is home to diverse indigenous cultures, with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders being two distinct (original) groups. While both groups have a shared history and connection to the land, they have unique cultural identities and origins. 

___

In this article, we find out the differences between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, highlighting their cultural beliefs, flags, special events, and notable figures. Also, we will explore their relationship with Papua New Guinea (PNG), as these two indigenous groups have historical connections with the neighbouring country.

(Read about Papua New Guinea and Australia's strong bond fostered during the WW II era, and by the Kokoda Trail and Bomana War Cemetry (at the present day)

Difference between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders

Aboriginal Australians are the indigenous peoples of mainland Australia and Tasmania. They arrived on the continent over 40,000 years ago and consist of numerous distinct groups spread across the country. 

On the other hand, Torres Strait Islanders are the indigenous peoples of the Torres Strait Islands, located north of Australia. They have Melanesian and Papua New Guinean ancestry and have a distinct cultural heritage influenced by their seafaring traditions and trade with neighbouring islands.

Both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have historical connections with Papua New Guinea. The Torres Strait Islands, where Torres Strait Islanders originate, are situated between Queensland and Papua New Guinea. The islands have served as a meeting point for trade, cultural exchange, and migration between Torres Strait Islanders and the indigenous people of Papua New Guinea, the Kiwais.

The Aboriginal Flag and Torres Strait Islander Flag

The Aboriginal flag is a powerful symbol of Aboriginal identity and unity. It features three horizontal stripes of equal width:

• black represents the Aboriginal people, 
• red symbolises the land and spirituality, and 
• yellow represents the sun and life-giving force. 

Created by Harold Thomas in 1971, the Aboriginal flag has become an important emblem for Aboriginal communities across Australia.

Similarly, the Torres Strait Islander flag represents the Torres Strait Islander people and their unique cultural heritage. Designed by Bernard Namok, the flag consists of three main colours: 

• green, symbolizing the land,
• blue, representing the surrounding waters, and 
• black, signifying the community. 

A white Dhari and a five-pointed white star beneath the Torres Strait Islander flag represent Torres Strait Islander customs and the major island groups within the Torres Strait.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children's Day - August 4th

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children's Day is an annual celebration that focuses on promoting the rights, well-being, and cultural identity of Indigenous children in Australia. 

Celebrated on August 4th each year, this day highlights the unique strengths and contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. It provides an opportunity to create a nurturing environment where their voices, stories, and cultural heritage are respected and valued.

Distinct Relationship between Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islanders and the Kiwais

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are distinct indigenous groups in Australia, each with their own cultural identities, beliefs, and historical connections. 

While Aboriginal Australians are the original inhabitants of mainland Australia, Torres Strait Islanders have ancestral ties to the Torres Strait Islands and the Kiwais of Papua New Guinea. 

Exploring these differences and connections helps foster a deeper understanding and appreciation of Australia's indigenous cultures and their relationship with Papua New Guinea.

FAQs: Relationship between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and Papua New Guinea

Q1: What is the historical relationship between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and Papua New Guinea?

A1: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have historical connections with Papua New Guinea due to their geographical proximity. The Torres Strait Islands, home to Torres Strait Islanders, are located between Queensland (Australia) and Papua New Guinea. Trade, cultural exchange, and migration have occurred between these indigenous groups and the indigenous people of Papua New Guinea.

Q2: How did the connections between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and Papua New Guinea influence their cultures?

A2: The cultural connections between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and Papua New Guinea have influenced their respective cultural practices. Torres Strait Islanders, with Melanesian and Papua New Guinean ancestry, have cultural elements that reflect these influences. The trade networks and shared traditions have contributed to the diverse cultural heritage of both indigenous groups.

Q3: Are there linguistic connections between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander languages and Papua New Guinea?

A3: While there are no direct linguistic connections between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander languages and the languages of Papua New Guinea, the shared cultural interactions have influenced certain aspects of their languages. The Torres Strait Islander languages, such as Kala Lagaw Ya and Meriam Mir, have some similarities with the languages spoken in Papua New Guinea due to historical connections and contact.

Q4: Are there ongoing cultural exchanges or collaborations between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and Papua New Guinea?

A4: Yes, there are ongoing cultural exchanges and collaborations between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and Papua New Guinea. These initiatives aim to foster cultural understanding, promote shared heritage, and strengthen relationships between the indigenous communities of both countries. Festivals, arts programs, and cultural events provide platforms for cultural exchange and celebration.

Q5: How does the relationship between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and Papua New Guinea contribute to the cultural diversity of Australia?

A5: The relationship between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and Papua New Guinea enriches the cultural diversity of Australia. The historical connections, trade networks, and shared cultural practices have influenced the traditions, art, music, and stories of both indigenous groups. This cultural diversity enhances Australia's multicultural fabric and promotes intercultural understanding and appreciation.